| The Life Extension Foundation Forums > LEF Public Forums > Hormones > Progesterone/Estrogen | Forum Quick Jump
|
 |  generalhaney Registered Member
       Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 116 | Posted 8/19/2007 8:11 PM (GMT -5) |   | Everything I've heard about women taking estrogen has been bad. Very bad. I am not a woman, but my wife is always talking about how bad it is. She said something about getting the estrogen from horse urine...I just picked that up one day when she was talking about it...don't know what it means.
Why did the doctor think it was a good idea to supplement estrogen? Bottom line...If your wife was fine before the estrogen, leave well enough alone. It's no coincidence. If she had normal periods, wouldn't that mean that her hormones were in check? I don't know. Hopefully a woman will respond to this. All I've been told is that estrogen is like the brown acid. Stay away from the brown acid . I'm sure there are times when it's warranted, but from what I understand, doctors are passing it out like it's candy.
Progesterone on the other hand, is something my wife is looking into supplementing. We're trying to figure out when the right time of month is to get the blood test. We just got one back, but the levels are hard to understand cause they flucuate during the month. She's fairly certain that her levels are low, though. She's looking into some kind of bioidentical creams. Now, I'm the one that's doing the talking here so I might have messed some things up. My wife does not post here, so I'm trying to remember what she said...trouble is, I don't always listen. | | Back to Top | | |
 |  phoenix Registered Member
       Date Joined Oct 2006 Total Posts : 228 | Posted 8/19/2007 11:07 PM (GMT -5) |   | | Yes we totally agree with you that estrogen is bad, alone that is, but when combined with progesterone it is good. At least that is what we have read and heard from our hormone doctor. I'll pass on to her what you said. Thank you for your comments. It is appreciated. | | Back to Top | | |
  |  Cini Registered Member
       Date Joined Aug 2006 Total Posts : 369 | Posted 8/20/2007 1:35 PM (GMT -5) |   | Hi, Phoenix: I assume your wife's levels were checked before she started on HRT? Her levels were probably low to start with, otherwise it makes no sense that her Dr. would supplement. Her period can be late because she started HRT, but it's not necessarily a sign that HRT is the wrong thing for her to do. Hormonal shifts can easily delay the period.
Estrogen is not always bad news. Estrogen replacement without sufficient progesterone seems to be dangerous. Estrogen replacement is no different than GH replacement or testosterone replacement. Do you believe it's a good idea to supplement what we don't produce in adequate quantities any longer as we age? It's a personal decision and you can find numerous articles by experts for both sides, pro and con.
The important thing seems to be to get the balance between estradiol and progesterone right. That can take a while and may require several blood tests.
The next decision is if one wants to use bio-identical hormones or pre-fabs like Premarin (PREgnant MAre uRIN). My personal opinion is that I would not touch Premarin et al with a ten foot pole. (Part of that has to do with the dismal conditions these poor mares live in and that thousands of Premarin foals are sent to slaughter every year.)
Unfortunately there are no big and extensive studies about bio-identicals. Those cannot be patented, big pharma does not make a fortune selling them and therefore there is no grant money for studies.
The difference between bio-identicals and regulas is not so much the source (urine vs plants e.g.) but the structure. The structure of bio-identicals is the same as human estrogen, progestrone etc. Regular HRT like Premarin has a few molecules added so they can patent it , this adding of molecules renders it non-identical because the product has a slightly different structure than the hormones it aims to replace.
The best day to test for progesterone is supposedly day 21 of the cycle. Progesterone levels should be highest on this day. Definitely test for progestrone during the last 14 days of the cycle. | | Back to Top | | |
   |  Mother Margaret Registered Member
       Date Joined Jan 2005 Total Posts : 323 | Posted 8/22/2007 11:48 AM (GMT -5) |   | | When I was well into menopause over 10 years ago, I thought I should take this type of thing and asked the doctor to let me have the hormone patch instead of taking the tablets. No problem. Well it was a big problem, because I started bleeding a lot, when I had had no periods for about 2 years. (Testing to see whether or not I was in menopause was a waste of time & money.)
I reported this to the gynecologist I was seeing (300 miles from where I live) and he said he didn't know too much about the patch ... just keep on doing it for awhile longer. Nuts to that, I used my own head and stopped taking the patch, or doing anything at all.
Well next time for my visit (I used to go every 2 years - now I don't go at all), one of the fibroid tumors had enlarged and had to be surgically removed. I firmly believe that had I not taken the hormones in 'the patch' this would not have happened.
Anyway, I want to share about a young woman age 36 who has fibroid tumors; one is seriously enlarged and she is bleeding a lot. Her doctor wants to do a hysterectomy, but her blood counts are not good enough, they are aiming at Sept now. In her case (I know the family history) & in mine I suspect that we both have effects from the teratogen chemical, 2-butoxyethanol, prior to our conception that would cause fibroid tumors in the first place.
So, could it be that something is off in her hormones, and that the enlarged tumor should be removed, but not necessarily a hysterectomy?
Another thing that came to mind ... is there something else causing a drop in blood counts beside the obvious? Of course, they suspect that it is from excessive bleeding during periods, or this tumor in particular; however, a concern I have is that blood counts can also be down from the FATIGUE of CFIDS which should be suspect (autoimmune action on the red blood cells) Doctors would find it if they were to LOOK at the red blood cells: AIHA or IMHA.
If ongoing exposure to this chemical is part of the picture (& it could be because she is a dental assistant, and second hand exposure is very possible in a small exam room & having a patient who could be poisoned ... breathing out this chemical for all that time).
| | Back to Top | | |
 |  generalhaney Registered Member
       Date Joined May 2007 Total Posts : 116 | Posted 8/22/2007 2:41 PM (GMT -5) |   | Hey Cini, She isn't even that regular. She's gone month's without a period. In fact, she rarely got periods until she started taking gh a couple of months ago. Now, she's gotten them pretty much on time the last two months. We think the gh has something to do with it. Maybe the gh supplementation helped balance out her previously unbalanced hormones. | | Back to Top | | |
  |  demigoddess Registered Member
       Date Joined Aug 2007 Total Posts : 42 | Posted 8/31/2007 11:32 AM (GMT -5) |   | | I agree that bio-identical hormone replacement therapy is a wonderful idea, while pharmaceutical hormones (premarin, etc) are a bad one. If her hormones are in a cream compounded by a good compounding pharmacy, rubbed into the skin, they would be bio-identicals. I have been using them myself for four years. In fact, at one time when I was lucky enough to afford humatrope and then added armour thyroid and bioidentical progesterone cream to my regime, I got so healthy I got pregnant at 43, with a man whose sperm count was too low to have children. I'm not saying children are a goal for everyone, just the health-fertility connection. In fact now that I have two children I couldn't dream about using humatrope and am again looking for a much less expensive GH. But I have not stopped my other hormone replacement creams, and I added testosterone and estrogen over the years as they were needed. Suzanne Somer's book Ageless is a really good resource on this. I recommend it, even though she's not a great writing talent. | | Back to Top | | |
| Forum Information | Currently it is Tuesday, February 09, 2010 8:29 AM (GMT -5) There are a total of 36,317 posts in 7,439 threads. In the last 3 days there were 1 new threads and 16 reply posts. View Active Threads
| | Who's Online | This forum has 8986 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, martin001. 1 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online. Details
|
Forum powered by dotNetBB v2.42EC SP3 dotNetBB © 2000-2010 All Contents Copyright © 2004, Life Extension™. All rights reserved. |
|
|