Life Extension Forums dotNetBB Forums : Join the Revolution dotNetBB Forums : Join the Revolution dotNetBB Forums : Join the Revolution dotNetBB Forums : Join the Revolution
  HomeLog InRegisterCommunity CalendarSearch the ForumHelp
   
The Life Extension Foundation Forums > LEF Public Forums > Miscellaneous Topics > FDA Fumbles Salmonella Peanut Recall; Peanut Corp. to be Probed for Criminal Misconduct  Forum Quick Jump
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
[ << Previous Thread | Next Thread >> | Show Newest Post First ]

B-17
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 192
 
   Posted 2/2/2009 12:26 PM (GMT -5)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
"The Georgia peanut processing plant responsible for the current wave of salmonella peanut frenzy across the U.S. reportedly knew its product was contaminated with salmonella, but decided to ship it anyway.

USA Today is reporting that senior members of Congress are calling for a federal probe into the actions of Peanut Corp. of America that could include criminal misconduct."
 
 

Post Edited By Moderator (DDye) : 2/2/2009 11:29:55 AM (GMT-5)

Back to Top
 

B-17
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 192
 
   Posted 2/8/2009 6:34 PM (GMT -5)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
FDA drops the ball again.  This agency needs to be sued.
 
Back to Top
 

B-17
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 192
 
   Posted 2/8/2009 6:39 PM (GMT -5)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

FDA helped unleash salmonella-laced peanuts on public

Do you know why the FDA is in charge of keeping America's food supply safe?

Because no other nation would have them.

That's the thought I'm left with after learning… and this was no big surprise… that the FDA played a larger role than we thought in allowing a salmonella outbreak to sweep through the nation, sickening hundreds and possibly killing 8 people.

I knew there would be more to this story.

By now you know that the salmonella outbreak has been tied to Peanut Corp.'s peanut processing facility in Georgia. I was surprised that our normally-bungling FDA was able to identify the source so quickly. Now I know why.

It turns out that the FDA knew for nine months that there were unsanitary practices going on at this facility. Nine months!

You see, Peanut Corp. tried to ship some peanuts into Canada back in April 2008. The shipment was rejected for having a "filthy, putrid or decomposed substance," and ended up in the FDA's possession.

They never tested it. After some back and forth with Peanut Corp., the FDA decided it had some serious concerns about the adequacy of the company's testing practices. It destroyed the shipment… and that was it.

No follow up. No testing of the rejected food. No asking Peanut Corp. to stop selling products until it got conditions at its plant back under control.

The FDA did what it does best. It got out of the way. It let a company that wasn't producing food suitable for Canadians keep selling to Americans.

And the story isn't over. It seems like every day the number of sick increases, and a new batch of products is recalled. Meanwhile, the FDA wants us to believe they're on top of the problem.

They're more than on top of the problem – they're party to blame for it.

 Don't count on food conglomerates or the FDA to look out for your health and safety. Buy locally and grow your own food when you can. Folks who do those two things always seem to come out of these public health messes just fine.

I buy as much organic as i can, If you don't buy the organics it will disappear from the shelves. Vote with your buying power. nono

Back to Top
 

B-17
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 192
 
   Posted 2/8/2009 6:41 PM (GMT -5)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.

Good news, bad news with new online salmonella resource

If there's one thing the FDA is good at – and this may be the only thing – it's documenting its own incompetence. After monumentally fouling something up, the FDA often does a nice job of helping folks like us understand the scope of the agency's incompetence.

The FDA has created a pretty useful online tool where you can see exactly which products have been recalled because of the salmonella scare. Maybe you've just been avoiding peanut butter and trying to ride this thing out, but there are now more than 125 products on the recall list – and some of them may be sitting in your home.

Visit http://tinyurl.com/8s3mwr and you'll see the complete list, even separated by product type.

It's a nice resource, and the FDA owes us that at least. As I told you a few days ago, news has surfaced that the FDA knew about the unsanitary conditions at Peanut Corp.'s Georgia processing facility for 10 months and let them keep selling peanut products.

That facility has now been linked to the salmonella outbreak that has sickened hundreds in more than 40 states, and may even be responsible for several deaths.

So, anyway, thanks to the FDA for a useful resource… you should check it out right away. It's just a shame they had to unleash a public health crisis in order to bring it to us.

 

Back to Top
 

B-17
Registered Member

Email Address Not AvailablePersonal Homepage Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2009
Total Posts : 192
 
   Posted 11/2/2009 10:30 PM (GMT -5)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
Late last month, the FDA cracked down on a cold-season giant.

In a letter to Procter & Gamble targeting two of its popular NyQuil and DayQuil products, the agency scolded the company for listing vitamin C among the inactive ingredients. It also issued a reminder that vitamin C is not on the list of ingredients that can be combined with the other drugs in the two products (among them, dextromethorphan, acetaminophen, and decongestant ingredients).

Let's set aside the fact that we never see this kind of treatment for supplement companies—a nice gentle reminder (not even a slap on the wrist) instead of a swift pulling of products. It's nice to see that the FDA pays attention from time to time.

And hey, they acknowledged that vitamin C should be considered an active ingredient!

But then they took it all back. Just one day later, a retraction appeared on the FDA Web site. Blaming an internal systems error, they said that no warning letter had actually been sent to Procter & Gamble. The retraction closes with, "The agency regrets any confusion caused by the posting."

Well, yeah, I am confused. How exactly does an "internal systems error" draw conclusions about the improper labeling of two big-time OTC products? Or did the FDA's concerns about the vitamin C in these two products simply disappear? I guess we'll never know, but hey, they regret the confusion!

More likely, the agency regrets poking at Procter & Gamble, which I'm sure poked back.

Of course, Procter & Gamble claims ignorance. They "cannot speculate as to what might have happened," but they're going to take it very seriously and work with the FDA to make sure everything is resolved. To whose benefit, I wonder?

You know, this sort of thing isn't exactly helping their new "transparent" image. If the FDA wants to gain our trust, they're going to have to try harder—a LOT harder. And quit answering every Big Pharma cry of "Jump!" with "How high?"


''Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."-- Sir Winston Churchill

Back to Top
 

DDye
Forum Moderator

Click to send DDye email.Personal Homepage Not AvailableAIM Not AvailableICQ Not AvailableY! Not AvailableMSN Not Available
Date Joined Jan 2002
Total Posts : 336
 
   Posted 11/2/2009 10:33 PM (GMT -5)    Quote This PostAlert An Admin About This Post.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm188543.htm
 
Back to Top
 
New Topic Post Reply Printable Version
 
Forum Information
Currently it is Monday, November 23, 2009 2:53 AM (GMT -5)
There are a total of 36,080 posts in 7,374 threads.
In the last 3 days there were 4 new threads and 20 reply posts. View Active Threads
Who's Online
This forum has 8803 registered members. Please welcome our newest member, mayilivelong.
1 Guest(s), 0 Registered Member(s) are currently online.  Details