Got this reply from my senator, (please show your objection to any forced vaccine pogrom by contacting your sprendators and represpendatives and sign the petiton
)
Thanks for the email, Cecilia. I have a bill in drafting.
- Glenn
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:23 PM
To: Sen.Grothman
Subject: Protect Us From Compulsory Pandemic
Sen. Glenn Grothman
WI
Dear Legislator,,
I am writing to you on a matter of grave personal concern at the
suggestion of the Natural Solutions Foundation, a not for profit
humanitarian NGO devoted to health and health freedom, to educate
decision makers and to petition for respect for our basic human rights.
This letter is regarding the proposed Protecting Americans'
Self-Shielding bill.
When the people of this district elected you, we anticipated that, true
to your election words, you would protect our well-being and our rights.
The proposed enforcement of mandatory treatment, including mandatory
vaccines, for any alleged "pandemic" condition is both a violation of
that commitment and a violation of my rights to control my own body and
make my own health choices.
Both State and Federal legislation now provides for the mandatory
vaccination, drugging or incarceration for those who refuse such
"treatment."
The hype and hysteria of the media and the distortion of the science of
infection and contagion by governmental and international bodies,
coupled with the pharmaceutical industry's headlong rush to force yet
more profits from vaccines which are untested, uninsurable and
dangerous, and from drugs which are known to be both ineffective and
unsafe, leads me to write to you to urge you to push back this
potentially deadly tide of political pandemic response.
Independent physicians such as Dr. Ron Paul MD, Dr. Rima E. Laibow MD,
Dr. Julian Whittaker MD, Dr. Joseph Mercola DO, Dr. John Wilson MD, Dr.
William Rea MD and Dr. William Sears MD, among others, have all warned
about
the dangers of forced vaccination and the ineffectiveness of such
measures to stop infectious disease. Their independent medical opinions
must be given great weight while the self-serving opinions of government
"experts" who demand forced vaccinations must be discounted as biased.
It is a clear violation of the Constitutional provisions against both
slavery and indentured servitude since a free, unindentured or enslaved
person may make his/her own health choices while an indentured servant
or slave's body is owned by a master who may make health decisions about
the body of the slave which may be enforced on a compulsory basis.
In addition to the moral and cultural repugnance which mandatory
treatment invokes, it violates the rights of citizens and introduces the
possibility of harm to them which cannot, under the current legal
structure, be recompensed. Vaccination is an uninsurable risk and
vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability for dangerous or even
deadly products, while vaccines have never been proven to be either safe
or effective. On the other hand, even the CDC admits that there are
risks of significant proportion with vaccines.
Any "pandemic vaccine" would be untested upon its use as predicted by
the CDC and WHO in the fall of 2009. The possibilities for disaster are
enormous. Those of us who do not desire these "treatments" should be
free to make such a choice with the endorsement and support of the
State.
As a person who is neither an indentured servant nor a slave, but a
member of your constituency, I urge you in the strongest terms to:
1. Commit to holding fact finding hearings in the immediate future to
evaluate the true status of the pandemic threat and pandemic treatment
safety; the Baxter Pharmaceutical incident earlier this year where
annual flu vaccines intended for 18 countries were "accidentally"
contaminated by live Avian Flu viruses, must be fully investigated.
2. Commit to putting your efforts toward reversing dangerous legislation
and policies which can endanger the lives and health of the members of
your constituency
3. Provide for sanction-free personal exemptions from proposed mandatory
drug or vaccination treatment, instead offering people who do not wish
to be so treated the opportunity and support necessary for
self-quarantine and self-shield at home, if needed for public safety
reasons. Such support would include food, water and communication
support, provision of medications or supplies of their choice and other
means which support their choice and safety. This alternative would be
far less expensive and socially disruptive than the forced re
location of
"vaccine refusers" in violation of the Geneva Conventions.
We demand full recognition of our right to protect ourselves in our own
homes.
Thank you for your support of liberty and of your sworn duty to protect
both the US Constitution and the well-being of your constituents.
Here is a link to the text of the bill for which we are seeking
congressional sponsorship, the Protecting Americans' Self-Shielding Act
-
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=2888 Yours in health and freedom,
cecilia